Sabtu, 22 Januari 2011

" puisi part iv "

Berharap

Sejak pertama ku lihat dirimu, kau sungguh mempesona
Dan kau sungguh menawan, membuat hatiku berdebar-debar
Khayalan tentang dirimu selalu menghantui ku
Ingin sekali kau menyanyikan lagu untuk ku
Rasa yang begitu mengebu-gebu
 Berharap kau menjadi miliki ku
Namun hanya khayalan yang bisa ku lakukan
Ku tak tahu harus berbuat apa
Tahu nama mu saja tidak
Aku harus berbuat apa agar kau mengetahui ku
Sayang datang lah kepada ku
Datang lah kepada ku
Kita rajut jalinan kasih bersama



" Puisi Part III "

Puisi untuk Ibu
Kau adalah wanita terhebat yang pernah ku temui
Pengorbanan mu sangatlah luar biasa
Kau wanita tegar
Tak pernah sekali pun ku melihatmu berkeluh kesah
Setelah dia pergi kau berjuang seorang diri demi anak-anak mu
Banyak rintangan yang kau hadapi
Cacimaki, fitnah pun telah kau hadapi
Tapi kau tetap tegar, tetap tersenyum
Seakan tak ada apa pun
Itu semua kau lakukan demi anak-anak mu
Agar mereka seperti mu
Menjadi orang yang begitu tegar
Aku sangat bangga memiliki seorang ibu seperti mu
Hidup ku kan selalu menjaga mu
Ku kan selalu mendoakan yang terbaik untuk mu ibu
kau adalah strong woman di dalam keluarga kecil ini 




" Puisi Part II "


Tak Sanggup

ku tak tau harus berbuat apa
ku mennyayangimu  setulus jiwa ku
sulitnya aku membuatmu mengerti akan sayang ini
berbagai cara telah ku tempuh
tapi kau tak pernah mengerti akan perasaan ini
melawan kerasnya sifat itu tak mudah
apa mungkin kah cara ku ini salah?
Sehingga kau tak pernah mengerti
Segala pengorbanan telah ku lakukan
Tapi mengapa, mengapa kau tak hargai segala usaha ku sayang
Aku tak sanggup bila harus seperti ini
Harus kah ku sudahi rasa ini
Semua karena mu, salah mu
Bukan aku yang menginginkannya seperti ini
Maaf sayang
Bila suatu saat nanti kita akan bersatu kembali
Mungkin itu semua jawaban




"Puisi Part I"

JANGAN PERGI

Lihat aku, lihat aku saja
Aku punya semua yang kau butuhkan
Aku akan memberikan semua yang kau inginkan
Tetaplah disisi ku, jangan pergi
Aku tak ingin menoleh kearah lain
Lihat aku, lihat aku saja
Jangan pernah mengkhianatiku
Terpikir sedikit pun jangan
Aku tak bisa membayangkan hidup tanpa mu
Aku tak akan membagimu untuk siapa pun
Harusnya kau tau itu
Tapi kenapa kau tak hanya melihat ke arah ku?
Kau terdiam, menelan sejta rahasiadidalam rongga mulutmu
Aku tercekat, tak menyangka begini caramu membalas cinta ku
Tidak, kau tak kan mudah lolos semudah itu
Kau milikku
Tak seorang pun boleh memiliki mu selain aku

Minggu, 02 Januari 2011

Pembelian

Proses Pembelian
Manusia adalah mahluk yang tak pernah puas dengan apa yang mereka miliki untuk sekarang ini ,dengan kata lain pasti ada saja keinginan lain yang mereka ingin miliki lagi .Contohnya  Seorang konsumen yang sudah memiliki kendaraan bermotor kini ingin memiliki mobil. Keinginan terjadi karena konsumen menyadari bahwa kalau memakai kendaraan bermotor sangat lah tinggi resikonya, misalnya terjadi kecelakan karena motor sangat mudah terjatuh jika tersenggol sedikit saja apalagi jika terjadi hujan, jalanan menjadi licin dan pengendara pun harus berhati-hati. Alasan lain juga karena cuaca di jakarta sekarang ini sudah sangat panas.
Pengalihan pengendara motor ke mobil ini di karenakan sikap dan kepercayaan yang sudah mulai ragu kepada pemakaian sepeda motor karena beresiko tinggi. Sudah banyak kejadian yang terjadi di sekitar kita yang mengalami kecelakan akibat tersenggol dengan penegndara lain. Ini juga akan berpengaruh pada klas social yang terjadi dimasyarakat jika konsumen berpindah ke kendaraan roda empat pastinya konsumen akan naik status sosialnya. Sudah kita ketahui kerena kendaraan roda empat tidaklah murah jadi pasti konsumen akan dipandang. Memakai  kendaraan roda empat ini juga menguntungkan bagi keluarga. Biasanya konsumen hanya mengajak satu oarng anaknya jika ia berpergian kini konsumen bisa mengajak semua anaknya, jadi tidak terjadi keirian di setiap anak-anaknya.
Dari beberapa sumber juga mengatakan bahwa memakai kendaran roda empat ini sangat menguntungkan tetapi juga ada yang bilang memakai kendaraan roda empat ini tidak terlalu senikfikan keuntungannya. Misalnya kalau memakai mobil kita pastinya mengeluarkan biaya yang lebih besar dibandingkan motor. Agar mobil ini tidak mudah rusak dan lama pemakaiannya kita juga harus rutin  menservisnya, ini menyebabkan biaya yang dikeluarkan menjadi mahal, belum lagi bensin yang sekarang ini tahap demi tahap naik mengakibatkan semakin besar pengeluarannya. Namun memang tidak dapat dipungkiri lagi kalau mobil keselamatannya lebih terjaga, asal kita benar-benar berkonsentrasi saat menyetir.
Dalam membeli sesuatu kita harus benar-benar memikirkannya jangan sampai kita salah memilih dan akhirnya menyesal. Apalagi yang barangnya tidaklah murah atau bisa dibilang mahal. Menetapkan sebuah tujuan pembelian sanagtlah penting. Di zaman yang sudah modern ini banyak alternatif yang bisa di lakukan jika kita ingin membeli sesuatu. Dengan cara transfer uang atau bayar langsung. Atau mungkin jika uang kita belum mencukupi untuk membeli mobil sekarang ini sudah banyak penawaran kredit yang tersedia atau meminjam uang di bank. 
Saat keputusan sudah diambil untuk membeli mobil ada serangkaian proses yaitu kita datang ke showroom mobil disana kita memilih mobil yang kita ingin dan juga melihat merk mobil yang kualitasnya bagus atau yang sudah  terpercaya dan langsung membelinya. Lalu sampailah mobil itu di tangan konsumen. Setelah mobil sudah dibeli kita harus rajin merawatnya dan pemakaiannya harus hati-hati, hal ini tidak hanya berlaku pada mobil saja namun berbagai barang yang kita miliki











IRAN


Iran's Nuclear Program
Updated: Sept. 7, 2010

Iran's nuclear program is one of the most polarizing issues in one of the world's most volatile regions. While American and European officials believe Tehran is planning to build nuclear weapons, Iran's leadership says that its goal in developing a nuclear program is to generate electricity without dipping into the oil supply it prefers to sell abroad, and to provide fuel for medical reactors.
Top American military officials said in April 2010 that Iran could produce bomb-grade fuel for at least one nuclear weapon within a year, but would most likely need two to five years to manufacture a workable atomic bomb. International inspectors said in May that Iran has now produced a stockpile of nuclear fuel that experts say would be enough, with further enrichment, to make two nuclear weapons.
President Obama spent 2009 trying to engage Iran diplomatically. Tehran initially accepted but then rejected an offer for an interim solution under which it would ship some uranium out of the country for enrichment. In June 2010, after months of lobbying by the Obama administration and Europe, the United Nations Security council voted to impose a new round of sanctions on Iran, the fourth.
By September, there were strong indications that Iran was beginning to feel pain — largely from additional sanctions imposed by the United States and European and Asian nations over the summer. But global nuclear inspectors reported at the same time that the country has dug in its heels, refusing to provide inspectors with the information and access they need to determine whether the real purpose of Tehran’s program is to produce weapons.
And there continue to be questions about how well the program is faring: in August 2010, the Obama administration persuaded Israel that it would take roughly a year — and perhaps longer — for Iran to complete what one senior official called a “dash” for a nuclear weapon, according to American officials.
Administration officials said they believe the assessment has dimmed the prospect that Israel would pre-emptively strike against the country’s nuclear facilities within the next year, as Israeli officials have suggested in thinly veiled threats.
Iran's Nuclear History
Iran's first nuclear program began in the 1960s under the shah. It made little progress, and was abandoned after the 1979 revolution, which brought to power the hard-line Islamic regime. In the mid-1990s, a new effort began, raising suspicions in Washington and elsewhere. Iran insisted that it was living up to its obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, but in 2002, an exile group obtained documents revealing a clandestine program. Faced with the likelihood of international sanctions, the government of Mohammad Khatami agreed in 2003 to suspend work on uranium enrichment and allow a stepped-up level of inspections by the International Atomic Energy Association while continuing negotiations with Britain, France and Germany.
In August 2005, Mr. Khatami, a relative moderate, was succeeded as president by Mr. Ahmadinejad, a hard-line conservative. The following January, Iran announced that it would resume enrichment work, leading the three European nations to break off their long-running talks. Under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran has the right to enrich uranium, but the atomic energy association called for the program to be halted until questions about the earlier, secret program were resolved.
The Bush Response
The United Nations Security Council voted in December 2006 to impose sanctions on Iran for failing to heed calls for a suspension. In Washington, administration hawks, led by Vice President Dick Cheney, were reported to favor consideration of more aggressive measures, including possible air strikes, while Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice pushed for more diplomacy.
President George W. Bush sided with Ms. Rice, but declared that the United States would not negotiate directly with Iran until it suspended the nuclear research program. Months of inconclusive talks about talks followed.
The situation was muddied in December 2007 when American intelligence agencies issued a new National Intelligence Estimate that concluded that the weapons portion of the Iranian nuclear program remained on hold. That document said that Iran would probably be able to produce a nuclear weapon between 2010 and 2015, while cautioning that there was no evidence that the Iranian government had decided to do so, contradicting the assessment made in 2005. The estimates given by American military officials in April 2010 are roughly in line with the 2007 estimate. But in June, in the run up to a Security Council vote on sanctions, American officials made clear to their diplomatic counterparts that they now think that Iran has revived elements of its program to design nuclear weapons that the 2007 assessment concluded had gone dormant.
The Role of Israel
In 2008, President Bush deflected a secret request by Israel for specialized bunker-busting bombs it wanted for an attack on Iran's main nuclear complex and told the Israelis that he had authorized new covert action intended to sabotage Iran's suspected effort to develop nuclear weapons, according to senior American and foreign officials.
The White House denied Israel's request to fly over Iraq to reach Iran's major nuclear complex at Natanz, American officials said, and the Israelis backed off their plans, at least temporarily. But the tense exchanges also prompted the White House to step up intelligence-sharing with Israel and brief Israeli officials on new American efforts to subtly sabotage Iran's nuclear infrastructure.
Iran's announcement in February, 2010 that it would begin enriching its stockpile of uranium drew a furious response from Israel, which has said it would regard an Iranian nuclear weapon as an existential threat. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told European diplomats that the sanctions needed to progress quickly.
Obama and Negotiations
Mr. Obama first made waves with his views on Iran policy in 2007, when he said during a Democratic debate that he would, as president, be willing to meet without preconditions with Iran's leaders, and that the notion of not talking to one's foes was "ridiculous."
Since becoming president, Mr. Obama has pursued diplomacy, but his stance has become steadily more confrontational.
On Sept. 9, 2009, it was revealed that American intelligence agencies had concluded that Iran had created enough nuclear fuel to make a rapid, if risky, sprint for a nuclear weapon. But new intelligence reports delivered to the White House say that the country has deliberately stopped short of the critical last steps to make a bomb.
On Sept. 25, Mr. Obama, along with Prime Minister Gordon Brown of Britain and President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, revealed the existence of the secret underground plant. American officials said they had been tracking the project for years, but that the president decided to make public the American findings after Iran discovered that the secrecy surrounding the project had been breached.
The next week, talks were held between Iran and the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council — the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France — as well as Germany, and led by the European Union's foreign policy chief, Javier Solana. At the talks, Iran agreed in principle to export most of its enriched uranium for processing, a step that would have bought more time for negotiations by reducing the amount of potential bomb-making material in Iran’s hands for up to a year.
The news raised a tumult in Iran, with conservative politicians arguing that the West could not be trusted to return the uranium. Shortly after the accord was announced, Iran began raising objections and backtracking. On Oct. 29 it told the U.N.'s chief nuclear inspector that it was rejecting the deal.
On Feb. 9, 2010, Ali Akbar Salehi, the head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, said scientists at the Natanz nuclear facility south of Tehran had begun processing uranium to a purity level of 20 percent to provide fuel for a research reactor producing medical isotopes, raising alarms in Israel and the West.
Enriching uranium to 20-percent purity is high enough for use in a medical reactor but significantly lower than the 90-percent levels needed for nuclear weapons. The worry is that any effort to produce 20-percent enriched uranium would put the country in a position to produce weapons-grade uranium in a comparatively short time, nuclear experts say.
New Push, New Questions
The decision by Iran to pursue further enrichment elicited sharp reactions in several countries. The United States has been seeking United Nations backing for new sanctions, and has been talking with Britain and France, its closest allies on the United Nations Security Council, as well as Germany. Those countries have long supported tougher measures, which have been resisted by Russia and China. But both Russia and China have signaled new willingness to consider sanctions.
On Feb. 18, 2010, the United Nations’ nuclear inspectors declared for the first time that they had extensive evidence of “past or current undisclosed activities” by Iran’s military to develop a nuclear warhead, an unusually strongly worded conclusion likely to accelerate Iran’s confrontation with the United States and other Western countries.
The report, the first under the new director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Yukiya Amano, also concluded that the nation's weapons-related activity apparently continued “beyond 2004.” The I.A.E.A. report confirmed that Iran has enriched small quantities of uranium to 20 percent, but made no assessment of how close it might be to producing a nuclear weapon. It cited recently collected evidence that conveyed a picture of a concerted drive in Iran toward a weapons capability.
Following the agency's announcement, Russia said that it was "very alarmed" by Iran's unwillingness to cooperate with the I.A.E.A. And in late March, a Russian official disclosed that Russian and Chinese envoys had pressed Iran’s government to accept a United Nations plan on uranium enrichment during meetings in Tehran earlier in the month but that Iran had refused, leaving “less and less room for diplomatic maneuvering.”
In April, Mr. Obama announced a new nuclear strategy designed to ease fears in non-nuclear states that the United States might ever use atomic weapons against them. But Mr. Obama pointedly excluded countries like Iran and North Korea that have failed to live up to their obligations under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
But while the push for a higher level of enrichment has worried officials in Washington and Europe, the small scale of the effort has raised questions about how serious Iran is. Officials said the pilot plant could make perhaps three kilograms, or about seven pounds, of 20 percent fuel per month. At that rate, they added, making enough to power the research reactor in Tehran would take five to seven years. But the reactor has only months to go before it could run out of fuel, they estimated.
The experts said the leisurely enrichment pace suggested that Iran’s declared goal was disingenuous and that its real motive was simply to escalate its defiant brinkmanship and up the ante in global negotiations over its nuclear program. Moreover, the enriched material must be turned into reactor fuel rods — a process that many experts doubted Tehran could master.
The questions of Iran's sincerity was again raised by its announcement on May 17 of an agreement negotiated by Turkey and Brazil that could offer a short-term solution to its ongoing nuclear standoff with the West, or prove to be a tactic aimed at derailing efforts to bring new sanctions against Tehran.
The deal calls for Iran to ship 2,640 pounds of low enriched uranium to Turkey, where it would be stored. In exchange, after one year, Iran would have the right to receive about 265 pounds of material enriched to 20 percent from Russia and France.
The terms mirrored a deal with the West last October that had fallen apart when Iran backtracked, but by May 2010 the material to be shipped represented a far smaller portion of its enriched uranium.
The next day, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton announced that a deal had been struck with other major powers, including Russia and China, to impose new sanctions on Iran, a sharp repudiation of the agreement between Iran and Turkey.
The case for sanctions appeared to be bolstered by a May 31 report by international inspectors that declared that Iran has now produced a stockpile of nuclear fuel that experts say would be enough, with further enrichment, to make two nuclear weapons. The toughly worded report says that Iran has expanded work at one of its nuclear sites. It also describes, step by step, how inspectors have been denied access to a series of facilities, and how Iran has refused to answer inspectors' questions on a variety of activities.
The International Atomic Energy Agency reported that Iran has now produced over 5,300 pounds of low-enriched uranium, all of which would have to undergo further enrichment before it could be converted to bomb fuel.
The inspectors reported that Iran had expanded work at its sprawling Natanz site in the desert, where it is raising the level of uranium enrichment up to 20 percent - the level needed for the Tehran Research Reactor, which produces medical isotopes for cancer patients. But it is unclear why Iran is making that investment if it plans to obtain the fuel for the reactor from abroad, as it would under its new agreement with Turkey and Brazil.
Until recently, all of Iran's uranium had been enriched to only 4 percent, the level needed to run nuclear power reactors. While increasing that to 20 percent purity does not allow Iran to build a weapon, it gets the country closer to that goal. The inspectors reported that Iran had installed a second group of centrifuges - machines that spin incredibly fast to enrich, or purify, uranium for use in bombs or reactors - which could improve its production of the 20 percent fuel.
A Fourth Round of Sanctions
On June 9, the United Nations Security Council leveled its fourth round of sanctions against Iran’s nuclear program, but the measures did little to overcome widespread doubts that they — or even the additional steps pledged by American and European officials — would accomplish the Council’s longstanding goal: halting Iran’s production of nuclear fuel.
The new resolution, hailed by President Obama as delivering “the toughest sanctions ever faced by the Iranian government,” took months to negotiate and major concessions by American officials, but still failed to carry the symbolic weight of a unanimous decision. Twelve of the 15 nations on the Council voted for the measure, while Turkey and Brazil voted against it and Lebanon abstained.
After the Obama administration imposed additional sanctions on more than a dozen Iranian companies and individuals with links to the country’s nuclear and missile programs, the European Union followed suit with what it called “inevitable” new measures against Tehran.
The main thrust of the sanctions is against military purchases, trade and financial transactions carried out by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, which controls the nuclear program and has taken a more central role in running the country and the economy.
The United States had sought broader measures against Iran’s banks, insurance industry and other trade, but China and Russia were adamant that the sanctions not affect Iran’s day-to-day economy.
By late summer, the administration was arguing that the sanctions were beginning to bite, cutting off Iran’s access to foreign capital, halting investment in its energy sector and impeding its ability to send its ships in and out of some foreign ports.
But a report issued on Sept. 6 by the International Atomic Energy Agency showed that Iran was digging in its heels on some points. The agency protested that Iran had barred two of its most experienced inspectors from the country. They were barred only days after the Security Council passed its latest sanctions, part of a longstanding pattern of reducing access in retaliation for United Nations action. Iran has, however, permitted some other inspectors to enter.
The report also reiterated that for two years, since August 2008, Iran has refused to answer questions “about the possible existence in Iran of past or current undisclosed nuclear-related activities involving military-related organizations, including activities related to the development of a nuclear payload for a missile.” The report said it was “essential that Iran engage with the agency on these issues” because evidence can degrade with “the passage of time.”


Iran to Expose US Nuclear Aid to Israel
Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Saeed Jalili said Iran will soon reveal evidence of the United States’ delivery of enriched uranium to Israel.
Addressing the Fourth General Assembly of Islamic Radios and Televisions Union (IRTVU) in Tehran on Monday, Jalili said, “According to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), the world must prevent the proliferation of atomic weapons, but the main question for the Muslim world is where the Zionist regime (Israel) got its nuclear arsenal from,” IRIB reported.
He added that the Zionist regime and those who delivered nuclear weapons to this regime must be held accountable.
“We [Iran] will soon publish documents showing how the Zionist regime has gained access to the US’ enriched nuclear material and how these materials have been delivered to this regime,” he said.

Western Claims
Referring to the West’s claims over Iran’s nuclear program, the SNSC secretary said, “Those who refuse to recognize the Islamic Republic’s nuclear rights seek to divert public attention from decisive questions such as why the United States has not been disarmed of its nuclear weapons, why American and European citizens are facing the danger of stockpiling atomic arms (by their governments) and why the United States continues to proliferate (new generations) of nuclear weapons.”
Despite several reports by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirming no diversion towards a nuclear military program by the Islamic Republic, some western states--particularly the US--and Israel claim Tehran is secretly seeking to develop atomic weapons and have pushed the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) into imposing four rounds of sanctions against Iran for curbing the country’s nuclear program.
In addition to the UNSC sanctions, the US, European Union, Australia, Canada and Japan have imposed their own unilateral sanctions against Iran.
Tehran has repeatedly rejected the western claims, saying that its atomic activities are solely peaceful and in line with the Iranian nation’s indisputable rights under the NPT.
Iran has also criticized the West’s double standards in dealing with the country’s nuclear program for misrepresenting the country’s peaceful atomic activities while turning a blind eye to Israel’s nuclear arsenal as the only one of its kind in the Middle East with over 200 nuclear warheads.
Tehran considers western countries to be unqualified for judging other countries’ nuclear programs since they hold vast nuclear arsenals and have used them before, citing the US nuking of Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II in 1945 that killed around 200,000 people instantly.

Media Hype
Jalili noted that some powers, which are the criminal party and should stand trial, are trying to sit in the prosecutor’s seat by using media hype and “hence the media bear the burden of revealing the truth”.
“But the western media are trying to bring up false and secondary matters to hide the main issues,” he said.
Elsewhere in his remarks, the SNSC secretary said, “Today, world powers are trying to monopolize a number of issues, including science and their veto right at the UNSC.”
“As an example, their opposition to the Islamic Republic’s peaceful atomic activities is because they don’t want to lose their monopoly over nuclear science,” he said. Jalili stressed that by defending its nuclear rights, Iran is actually defending the rights of all NPT member-states and independent countries. 
Referensi: wikipedia